Community Capacity - Building and Participation: A Pre – requisite
for Sustaining Governments’ Development Assistance at the Grass Roots.
Government implement policies and
provide public services such as health, education, transport, water,
sanitation, law and order, welfare and social support, and invest in physical
infrastructure and maintenance through the various Ministries, Departments and
Agencies (MDAs).
These
programmes/projects and services are ‘delivered’ to communities as passive
recipients and beneficiaries of government development assistance. The
non-inclusion and non-participation of the local people in the decision –
making process and the government failure to enhance the capacity of the local
people to participate in such project implementation takes the control outside
the communities. Government experts remain in charge of the entire project
planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation processes. The inability of
the government to consult the local people through community forum/platform
means that community people are not given the opportunity to participate in
making decision with regard to the government’s development assistance. This
also means that community capacity building plan may not be part of the
project. Ultimately, communities may be
unable to maintain or sustain such facilities and services when they are
delivered to them.
In their effort to implement various public
interest programmes/projects and services, governments over the years have
failed to consider how to address the capacity of communities to manage or
co-manage their development assistance. To ensure the sustainability of its
development projects, government should begin to adopt a strategy that support
and encourage community management and maintenance of such facilities by
empowering the people and building the capacity of the local communities. It is
through such capacity building effort that local people can gain valuable
skills to promote self-help and self-reliance and ensure community ownership,
maintenance and sustainability of government programmes/projects and facilities
at the community level.
The ‘Top
Down’ approach adopted by government over the years has only solved short term
problems as majority of government services and facilities built in many
communities are not adequately maintained. The “Top Down” approach restricts
community capacity and initiative, disempowers local people, creates the
mentality of dependence on the government, and stifles local leadership and
local organizing. In fact, the outcome of this approach can best be described
as enslavement camouflaged as public service. It is not just unsustainable; it
provides temporary relief in terms of service delivery to the people.
However,
the ‘bottom – up’ approach adopted by social enterprises recognize that
communities are diverse, consisting of a wide range of sectors, institutions,
groups, associations and individuals with differing perceptions and interests,
whose potentials must be harnessed to ensure their full participation in
development. A key strategy is to ensure capacity building and empowerment of
the local community people. It is often said that there is no development
without participation and any approach that will be successful, should
recognize the critical role of the local people themselves in determining their
own development.
While the
‘top down’ approach limits the participation of community networks, the ‘bottom
– up’ strategy supports the building of social and human capacity, encourages
community participation, and the inclusion of diverse range of people including
those who have traditionally been marginalized by the mainstream society in
development effort. Involving the local people in every development process, as
well as improving the capacity of the local people can foster a sense of
communal ownership and sustainability of governments development
programmes/projects and services.
No comments:
Post a Comment